Businesses And Imitators: Too Easy To Copy?

Remember when Groupon was going to be the next big thing?  Now of course everyone seems to be copying their model as we saw last week (http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2011/08/04/will-amazon-google-and-aol-kill-groupon.aspx).

Of course I didn't expect GroupOn to survive anyway – their model seemed to be the kind that'd dilute too easy, and that would have diminishing returns (as near every ad-related internet idea has).  It seems now that before they get a chance to die off naturally, everyone else is going to squeeze them out.

It's not as if GroupOn exactly has a complex idea – it's an advanced coupon system.  There are a lot of companies in similar fields, they just did it big and made it work.

This has me thinking about imitating businesses.

If you can have imitators or many people in a similar field, and your model is simple enough to imitate, someone with money and time can easily horn in on your territory, like . . . well Google, Amazon, and so on.  This seems to be what's happening to GroupOn (at least after their failed sale).

This made me speculate on something – are we at a time where it's easier than ever to ape, imitate, or replace an existing business?

  • There are big companies that can quickly ape some business models.
  • There's so much technology, so many automated setups, so many services, you can set up a business very quickly.
  • We have investors looking for a sure thing.
  • It's a global market, so people can access talent all over – and at any time.
  • There's little piracy for new businesses – "stealth mode" may sound nice, but people also want to use social media and go viral, which means exposure . . .
  • Come to think of it, we also have a lot of people wanting to work . . .

These situations don't mean that your dream business or someone else's won't survive and dominate.  It just means it's a lot easier for people to horn in on you territory – or just destroy you.

If this is true – and I think it is something to consider – it means a few things for your future:

  • If your business model (or that of your employer) can be imitated, you'd better move fast and have an edge over competitors.
  • If your business model involves something unique that's truly hard to duplicate, you may have an edge.  In fact, if businesses and people are being more cautious about risky ventures, a risky venture by you may ironically be safer as you remove the danger of imitation.
  • I'm wondering if this means people will avoid certain businesses and ideas because they may be imitated.  This could, oddly, leave a lot of space for businesses that do "the obvious and easily imitated" because people abandoned the obvious because it was easily imitated – and no one filled the gap.

So what do you think?  Are we in a time where imitation is easy – so easy in fact it may discourage businesses from even coming together?

– Steven Savage

Go Farther: The SocialBox

SocialBox

So Google's Hangouts may be a killer app: http://gadgetwise.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/05/is-googles-hangouts-its-killer-app/.  The article – and indeed Hangouts itself – emphasize what people want in social tech: immediate, human connectivity.

This got me thinking, which is not unusual.  Hangouts, Skype, Facebook chat, all point me towards what I believe could be the future social "killer app;" indeed a service so needed I expect multiple companies to try and make it.  I'll call it The SocialBox.

Read more

Survey Sunday Roundup: Ecosystem Enigmas

So last Sunday we asked this question:

"So, once Amazon announces their inevitable Tablet, we'll have three "ecosystems of integrated technology more or less – Google, Amazon, and Apple. Who's going to throw their hat into the ring of integrated-consumer-systems next?"

What did we get?

  • 0% of people said Wal-Mart
  • 50% of people said Microsoft
  • 16.7% of people said Sony
  • 16.7% of people said HP
  • 16.7% of people said someone we haven't thought of yet!

(No one for Wal-Mart?  I'm kind of surprised).

And what comments did we get?

  • Amazon – However they're too late.
  • In some sense Sony is already trying to do this with the next PSP, but it's rather different in scope and intention
  • My guess is one of the social media networks looking to expand past what currently exists.
  • Microsoft. They're going to go all out on the XBox to make it a kind of ecosystem, and as a basis for future development.

Some good comments – but I found the idea of a Social Media network jumping in on this to be REALLY intrigung.  Facebook or Twitter or someone with a good infrasctucture we haven't thought of could have the time and cash to launch one.  Imagine, for instance, LinkedIn.com doing a "business computer" of some kind, or Salesforce branded systems?

Great thoughts – and keep it coming team!

Steven Savage