Resume-Worthy Followup!

You know that one of her favorite words around here at Fan To Pro is "resume worthy." That, of course, is our term for the kind of company that should get your resume, often because they are cool, make neat things, and of course have probably received boatloads of venture capital. What can I say? We progeeks have got to help those folks spend that investment money wisely.

I'm sure you see our listings here of “resume–worthy” companies. I'm sure you see them yourself when you read the news, glance over blogs, or read interesting e-mails from your fellow pros and friends. We all do it, looking at the company and saying "wow, it would be cool to work there."

We all say that. So let's make sure those of us looking for work follow-up on it as well.

Read more

Frustration Friday: Money Is The Measure

I wonder why people associate having money with being some kind of authority.

Let's face it of the many lessons the Great Recession is shown us it's that having money and making money don't necessarily correspond with brains, ethics, or doing anything productive. Some people were just nasty bastards that manipulated the system, got enriched, and help shake up the world economy. I'm not seeing dollar signs translate to some kind of authority here, unless it's expertise in exploitation (and even then some of the stories sound like sheer luck and bad regulation were major factors)

This is an issue of been curious about for a while;, why someone's bank account equals a kind of moral economic, and even political authority.  Certainly we can observe many people that came into money by luck, inheritance, unethical but effective behaviors, and so on.  Certainly people don't look to those made rich by acting or sports performance as authorities on life as much as they do others, so there are instinctively different kinds of "rich experts."

There are people whose large bank accounts certainly have demonstrated talent; Bill Gates, Mark Zukerberg, and more.  Hell, I live in Silicon Valley, a giant mass of smart people making huge amounts of money, and many times that does have to do with talent.  Yet, it's not consistent enough for me to think it's some kind of useful measure or the major measure of someone's authority.

So I've come to the conclusion. This money-is-authority mindset is just easier

It's easy to assume lots of money equals talent, and moral and economic authority. It's a number, a score, a simple way to look at. Very simply it takes less thought.

It's kind of like a financial version of being ordained by God, of divine rule. It's a simple thing to accept and not complicate your worldview with all the messiness of actual life. The King used a rule because God said so, now such and such investment banker or business guru is supposed to be listened to because of his bank account. Numbers as a substitute for God.

I dunno.  Maybe it's a kind of Calvinist thing.

This is just a distraction from the complexities of life. It's just an attempt to make things simple, and easy–and as usual attempts to find simplicity lead to conclusions that are terribly wrong. People can be rich–and poor–for number of reasons that have nothing to do with authority, talent, skill, ethics, or any other virtue. That's just life

Heck, I've ranted about this before. I've even noted that some of us are not paid based on “value” but for other reasons that are entirely legitimate and understandable. That's the way goes.

So, let's get over the idea that bank accounts equal authority. It just means you have money, and you can have it for number of reasons. Looking for leadership, inspiration, understanding, and guidance requires a complex assessment of the people involved.

Sadly, I think we'll be dealing with the idea of authority by bank account for a while to come. I just hope that the trauma of the Great Recession means people are less enchanted with the concept.

Steven Savage

News Of The Day 3/3/2011

Disney gets into HTML5 games, DirectTV angers theater owners, and John Romero goes casual. A lot's up in today's geeky news!

Economics/Geekonomics:
A few improvements, but the unemployment report is grim.

Demographics:
I hesitate to call this a must-read as it's more for demography geeks and californias, but this year-plus old look at Job Sprawl in Northern California is fascinating. this area (which I live in) is a mix of cities and towns, sort of a megaregion, sort of not, and facing assorted challenges – and jobs are not always in the areas best served by public transport. I've witnessed some of this trend, and it's actually a bit strange to realize how many big companies and big jobs are NOT in major urban areas, which makes transport an issue. Can't say I agree with everything but it's fascinating.

Media:
Ruckus Media gets $3.5 million in investment. It may not be a huge amount, but check out their business model – children's stories done as apps. They've got 15 books already, and as I've heard kids take to tablets very well, they may be onto something. I christen them resume-worthy just on ambition . . . and $3.5 million dollars.

Demand Media continues to expand by buying another blogging service, CoveritLive

Movies:
The mathematics of How Oscars affect box office. Something to chew on for film buffs and pros.

Sofware As a Service: Salesforce releases new version of ServiceCloud and integrates with Apple's FaceTime. They just keep going forward quietly and humbly – more or less – and dominating the market. By the way, catch the comment near the end that services aside, some of them might run into bandwidth problems . . .

Social Media:
Facebook Seattle is slowly growing just so you know it's not all about Palo Alto. Facebook will inevitably keep expanding to take advantage of different geographic footprints – the question is where and when.

Technology:
Paypal focuses on Android in their next developer challenge. Gives you an idea of where their focus is – though I think with recent Android app security concerns they might also be hyping security . . .

MUST READ: An analysis of why Sun failed. One of the takeaways I get is that oddly, their free-giveaways really didn't work well with their goals, and their goals were at odds with who they were or became.

Video:
Up those video wars: DirectTV plans to launch early video-on demand. Whats the problem? Theater chains aren't happy. Actually the whole lifetime of a film seems to be compressed at this rate so I'm not sure anyone's happy . . .

Video Games:
Important news: Disney acquires HTML gaming startup Rocket Pack. Why important? First, Rocket Pack does HTML5 games – games in browser and not relaint on other technologies (such as Flash or as installed apps), and Disney's backing will give HTML 5 a boost. Secondly this gives us a better hint of Disney strategies – we know they want to go multiplatform, but it appears that'll be browser-based in many cases. Finally, it's a reminder that the browser isn't going to die as long as people are bloody tired of rewriting the same app several times.

John Romero is heading toward casual games, as is his new company Loot Drop. Let's see how that goes – and see if Loot Drop is hiring! I like how he views some of his games as ways to learn to play games, which suggests some smart demographic thoughts.

Ryzom is the latest MMO to go Freemium.

Finally, I don't care if you like Disney or not, these live-action reconstructions are just cool. Also Hugo Weaving's Red Skull looks incredibly menacing.

QUESTION OF THE DAY: Will Disney's obvious move to HTML5 get any immitators in the short term?

– Steven Savage