Second-Class Formatting?

Yes, once again I'm going to talk about my Amazon Kindle. No, this is not a case of me going on how great it is, how much I love it, ad nauseum. You've probably had enough of that as it is. Instead, I want to share an insight on the nature of e-books that I didn't notice until I began using the Kindle so much.

What have I noticed? I've noticed that, despite many of the e-books I'm reading coming from professional print sources, some of them have distinct formatting errors on the Kindle. I'd say easily two thirds of the books I've read on the Kindle have noticeable formatting problems, some of them quite distinct and incredibly annoying, such as unclear graphics, oddly placed titles, mashed words, and more.

It's as if Kindle books get a kind of "second-class" formatting.

Somehow, I don't think I'm alone in experiencing odd, strange, and outright painful formatting problems on books I'm reading on the Kindle. I'm quite sure other people are experiencing this as well; all those people on my daily trains reading Kindles doubtlessly are experiencing questionably–formatted books too.

So unless I'm the unluckiest reader in Amazon–land, everyone is experiencing formatting problems with their Kindle books now and then. So why aren't we complaining?

Read more

Resume-Worthy Followup!

You know that one of her favorite words around here at Fan To Pro is "resume worthy." That, of course, is our term for the kind of company that should get your resume, often because they are cool, make neat things, and of course have probably received boatloads of venture capital. What can I say? We progeeks have got to help those folks spend that investment money wisely.

I'm sure you see our listings here of “resume–worthy” companies. I'm sure you see them yourself when you read the news, glance over blogs, or read interesting e-mails from your fellow pros and friends. We all do it, looking at the company and saying "wow, it would be cool to work there."

We all say that. So let's make sure those of us looking for work follow-up on it as well.

Read more

Frustration Friday: Money Is The Measure

I wonder why people associate having money with being some kind of authority.

Let's face it of the many lessons the Great Recession is shown us it's that having money and making money don't necessarily correspond with brains, ethics, or doing anything productive. Some people were just nasty bastards that manipulated the system, got enriched, and help shake up the world economy. I'm not seeing dollar signs translate to some kind of authority here, unless it's expertise in exploitation (and even then some of the stories sound like sheer luck and bad regulation were major factors)

This is an issue of been curious about for a while;, why someone's bank account equals a kind of moral economic, and even political authority.  Certainly we can observe many people that came into money by luck, inheritance, unethical but effective behaviors, and so on.  Certainly people don't look to those made rich by acting or sports performance as authorities on life as much as they do others, so there are instinctively different kinds of "rich experts."

There are people whose large bank accounts certainly have demonstrated talent; Bill Gates, Mark Zukerberg, and more.  Hell, I live in Silicon Valley, a giant mass of smart people making huge amounts of money, and many times that does have to do with talent.  Yet, it's not consistent enough for me to think it's some kind of useful measure or the major measure of someone's authority.

So I've come to the conclusion. This money-is-authority mindset is just easier

It's easy to assume lots of money equals talent, and moral and economic authority. It's a number, a score, a simple way to look at. Very simply it takes less thought.

It's kind of like a financial version of being ordained by God, of divine rule. It's a simple thing to accept and not complicate your worldview with all the messiness of actual life. The King used a rule because God said so, now such and such investment banker or business guru is supposed to be listened to because of his bank account. Numbers as a substitute for God.

I dunno.  Maybe it's a kind of Calvinist thing.

This is just a distraction from the complexities of life. It's just an attempt to make things simple, and easy–and as usual attempts to find simplicity lead to conclusions that are terribly wrong. People can be rich–and poor–for number of reasons that have nothing to do with authority, talent, skill, ethics, or any other virtue. That's just life

Heck, I've ranted about this before. I've even noted that some of us are not paid based on “value” but for other reasons that are entirely legitimate and understandable. That's the way goes.

So, let's get over the idea that bank accounts equal authority. It just means you have money, and you can have it for number of reasons. Looking for leadership, inspiration, understanding, and guidance requires a complex assessment of the people involved.

Sadly, I think we'll be dealing with the idea of authority by bank account for a while to come. I just hope that the trauma of the Great Recession means people are less enchanted with the concept.

Steven Savage