Way With Worlds: Recording Your World

Shelves

[Way With Worlds appears at Seventh Sanctum at at MuseHack]

So you want to build a nice detailed setting. You are ready to keep a record of everything so you review and expand your work. You’re ready to dive into this and put your world to pen, keyboard, map, and file.

This raises the question of just how you record everything.

If you’ve ever visited a fan wiki or purchased one of those “world of . . .” books that attempts to distill a novel or series of novels into a record of that universe, you know there is a lot of data. It can be a little daunting because when you want to create your setting in detail, really get into it, and you’re basically creating one of those. On your own. Along with writing your story or stories.  It’s a bit daunting

What’s the best way to do it?

Well, that’s actually several questions. So let’s get to them.

Read more

Make It So: The Abandonment Archive

Awhile ago I confronted the citizen/ethical issue of what fans should do with our historical, and perhaps even relevant yet ultimately really awful works. What to do with bad fan art, embarrassing fan fiction, and so on? Hiding and never speaking of it is appealing, but let’s face it some of that is rather relevant to our culture, our development, and the historical record.

Awful, but relevant. Indeed I still wish someone had saved a copy of the delightfully named “Final Pottermon VII” from a decade ago just so I had proof it existed.

Jokes aside, I don’t want stuff saved to find the next Eye of Argon. Really some fanfic, fan art, embarrassing websites, half-baked games and the like are pieces of geek history. They say something about people, time, and technology.

It’s just some people don’t want it said about them. But these are history.

Come to think of it, there’s also a lot of great work out there that’s just abandoned, left on rotting sites and old hard drives. There’s things we’ve forgotten or overlooked from our years and decades of geeky participation. There’s half-finished or unpublished novels. That too is out there, not being analyzed, understood, or applied, and it too is part of our history.

I have a theory. We need an Abandonment Archive.

The Abandonment Archive

My idea would be an archive where people could leave complete works very, very anonymously. So left, with relevant information, they’d be archived and accessible. The emphasis would not just be on access per se, but for research, understanding, and historical record.

So people would leave:

  • The work in question.
  • Comments on where the work was posted, time, etc.
  • Historical reference and information – “This was inspired by Battle of the Planets before I knew about Gatchaman.”
  • Any relevant critique, information, or notes.

It would also not focus on things that are “bad” but things that people sort of want to wash their hands of or want to preserve and make public. It may be written during “a phase,” is out of date, or is just not something they care for any more. The Abandonment Archive lets them put it to rest for whatever reasons – and let people find it anew.

Some works that are original could even be made public domain or put up for “adoption” in some cases.

Of course such an archive would then have to be curated. There’s a chance people would leave things out of vengeance, spite, mockery, or troublemaking. There’s a chance of people leaving a few minor pieces that might not be worth curating. There’s also just people who won’t fill the forms out.

I have the feeling the right group of fans, writers, acafen, and so forth would find this an ideal job.

Done properly, you’d get an archive of history of fannish activities. Some may be old, distant, obscure, or embarrassing, but history is history – and a little anonymity would be quite helpful.

From here you could add even more features:

  • An anonymous 3rd party email correspondence system for people to coordinate archival information about what they’re abandoning.
  • “Triage” contests to salvage or improve works.
  • Newsletters or even physical books when appropriate, or other releases to help pay for the thing.
  • Historical research and analysis posts on culture.
  • Posts to share memories.

Will it work? I have no idea. But I’m throwing it out there to see what you think . . .

– Steven Savage

Seventh Sanctum Update 12/22/2013: New Generator

Well with the site rewritten, the numbers back, a new year starting, and some time off I decided to write a brand new, in-depth generator to finally solidify the mojo that’s come back.  So I chose something that seemed both easy and popular, the Magical Legend Pony Namer, which seemed simple and fun, and of course played into the most unexpected fandom ever to dominate the internet and the insanely long-lived collector enthusiasm.

Actually it works pretty well, but what was stunning – and indeed obsession-making – is it taught me about language patterns I’d missed.  This is actually going to help out in future generators.  Without boring you (because I could go on) here’s what I learned, mostly thanks to the incredibly extensive online resources I found.

Lesson One.  There’s a continuity between descriptive terms and objects – but it’s not that some objects can also define things (like the word “silver”) but objects at times define objects (the words “Pasta Salad” have an object defining another object).  So there’s a  little more complexity than I realized here, and I think future (and revised) generators will be better for noticing this.

Lesson Two.  Names have a level of formality about the – or a lack.  The level of formality affects how you associate names, words, titles, and concepts and the difference between a formal name and a nickname.  This is reasonably easy to classify, actually.

So I learned something.  I just didn’t expect to.  I’ll now leave you to the names.

– Steven Savage