Technology

Holograms, Personalities, And New Awareness?

by

So the Tupac Hologram is getting plenty of attention as well as some menage. This is causing people to notice Hatsune Miku, Japan’s Holo-pop princess who’s being doing this so long she’s old by hologram standards. Also, she does not feel Obi-Wan Kenobi IS her only hope.

Some time ago I wrote a series of columns on the viability of virtual stars. I stand by this fact and the article above notes the phenomena and some advantages.

Most telling is the comment in the above Daily Beast article about virtual stars that they don’t age, get old, have scandals, etc. They’re pure entertainment mixed with a strange kind of purity overall. Hatsune Miku will not die, or OD, or get into a scandal, or even age. There’s something people will doubtlessly find refreshing.

The use of Tupac in a hologram, a man who died an unpleasant death, further reinforces that divide. Though I’m sure his many fans were thrilled to see him “resurrected”, this technical incarnation also reinforces the gap between real stars and entirely virtual ones. Also, I think some people may find the “resurrection” a bit creepy.

However, Tupac’s holographic return is bringing new attention to Virtual Stars, and I’d like to add some additional analysis.

  • This is getting increased attention for Japanese virtual stars, so I’d pay attention and see if increases interest further.
  • In addition, the resurrection of such a popular singer may increase interest in other “holoncarnations” of stars or the creation of “native” holo-singers.
  • The technology certainly remains viable to create virtual stars, and social media’s increasing relevance means its easier to create fast viral marketing and recognition. Attempts to make new stars can take off quickly (as witnessed by the Tupac hologram).
  • The fact they can be created quickly could appeal in this world of ever-increasing short-term thinking and desire for quick results.

Tupac is back? He may well be just the start.

– Steven Savage

Ikea To Sell Electronics?

by

It starts in Europe, but you know it’ll expand.

So it appears that Ikea is starting with a specialty-manufactured TV in China, and Magnus Bodesson, the guy in charge of living rooms (and who’s name may be as cool as Baldur Bjarnson and Richard Baldovin) notes the advantages Ikea has in pricing.

Ikea selling electronics actually makes sense:

  • They have the floorspace and warehouse space.
  • They do a lot of home elements that aren’t furniture despite their image as a furniture company.
  • They already promote their furniture with mockups of TVs, etc. in their stores anyway – and as they sell “complete sets,” electronics plays into it.
  • They have insanely huge reach.

So I’m pretty sure they’ll prototype this, it’ll work or break even, and they’ll go and try more.  You know who gets in trouble?

Best Buy.

Ikea could, with relative ease, throw in a lot of basic electronics and home goods.  They could do their own brands/rebrands, but it might also be easier to use local/popular brands.  They have a supply chain that works.  They have money.  People are already in a shopping mood when they come in.

So if they start moving TV’s and other home devices, Best Buy is the one that takes the big hit in my opinion.  Admittedly it’d probably take Ikea awhile to ramp this up (1-3 years), so there’s a chance for Best Buy to implode on its own.  But if they’re still playing in the home electronics space, this could be a finishing blow.

I never saw Ikea getting into this space.  Makes me wonder what else I’m missing . . .

– Steven Savage

 

 

Further Thoughts on E-Publishing And Missing Out

by

Serdar brought up the point that in a way, publishers brought the Amazon mess on themselves because they resisted e-book technology. I think he had a brilliant insight, and want to expand on it further.

Let’s take a look at the whole Kindle idea. In many ways it’s a bare-bones thing (at least before the Tablet), a black-and-white-display (however with cool e-Ink), simple delivery, basic formatting. The Kindle is impressive as a unified system, but except for that e-ink, it doesn’t seem that innovative, from file format to the menu

But what Amazon did is string the links together in a chain that worked. They pushed it, they stuck buy it, they evolved it. I myself used to think the Kindle sounded ridiculous, now I own one. The Nook sounded like a runner-up, and now I not only hear great things, I have a friend who can’t put her’s down.

The iPad? Yeah.  Some issues but the big lawsuit shows Apple was big enough to talk with . . .

Of course each “link” chain should be obvious, but the Publishers didn’t  follow that.

All those publishers had money. They had technology. They had allies in book chains. They had people talking about eBooks and playing with formats.

They didn’t do anything. They left it to Amazon and Apple and Barnes and Noble. The Publishers avoided or dodged, didn’t take risks, and by and large let everyone else into the mobile space.

An alliance of publishers could have rallied around ePub. It could have backed a new device. It could have done all sorts of things. It didn’t exist and it didn’t happen.

Now what? I’ve launched books on my own, and the only reason to have a publisher is the marketing advantage (and there’s several small and mids for that). So many are exploring e-books. EVERYONE has to be on Kindle, and B&N is coming from behind (which I need to address in my own books).

It’s going to get wild, isn’t it?  Maybe people thinking of working for traditional publishing need to be thinking outside the box . . .

– Steven Savage