Why the Job Search Is a Conflagration of Hostility And Insanity

by

Watching the job search the last few years from all sides of the issue, I’ve tried to wrestle with why things just aren’t working.  Why can’t qualified people find jobs even when there are openings?  Why is the hiring process so insane and dysfunctional?  Why do so many recruiters and HR people seem like lost voices of sanity?

Why do people who are looking for jobs and employees want to tell me how bad everything is when I’m trying to eat lunch?

I’ve suspected before that the job search/hiring process is ossified.  I still stand by that thought, but I’ve wanted to add another issue I see burbling up out of the fetid swamps of the economy; we’ve been harmed by an adversarial approach.

First, the job seekers.  Man, they want jobs.  That’s understandable.  But after awhile it’s got to make a lot of people feel, well, kind of hostile and put upon.  How many times do you hear about some grand new job search technique, or optimized scanner-ready resumes, or something else that really comes down to “beat the system?”  I’m all for working the system, but I’m wondering if we’ve passed some BS event horizon where that’s all we’re trying to do.

Recruiters and HR?  They need people.  Only it’s more confusing, more erratic, the laundry-list job requirements don’t make a lick of sense.  Everyone is yelling at them, no one is happy, and they’re working in an ossified system that doesn’t work in the first place.  When you do find someone the requirements have changed, and in these tough times your neck is on the line if you get the wrong person.  So you want to get people without going through the BS, and maybe get a break.

These aren’t exactly cases of two groups seeing eye-to-eye.

So my theory is the job search situation’s already pretty massive problem has been made worse by increasing hostility among the various participants who are trying to “work the system” to avoid trouble, find what they need, and not get themselves fired.

Judging by the bitterness that I see, I’m betting this is a factor, especially the last two years.

That’s not a recipe for healthy interaction.  Or hiring.  Or anything else.

The hiring process is about delivering and finding value.  When people are too angry, too busy working the system, too busy treating the job search like a con job or a ninja assassination, they’re not delivering or finding value.  Right now I don’t think “value” is a big enough part of the entire hiring equation.

For me, I feel bad for recruiters and job searchers I know.  It’s why I try to introduce people.  Real connection cuts the hostility and the B.S.

Me, I love clever additions to the job search that actually work – the special resume tweak, the smart portfolio, etc.  I like seeing stuff that’s real.

We need to connect.  We need to stay with what’s real.  We need to dial down the hostility and frustration to do that.

I’m just not sure how easy it’s going to be.  Lunch is gonna keep getting interrupted for awhile . . .

– Steven Savage

Lamar Smith Is Back To “Protect The Children”

by

Lamar Smith, who gave us the disaster known as SOPA is now back with a supposed “protect the children/stop child porn bill” that really involves ISPs keeping your information and making it available without warrant. Now it’s only in the House, with no Senate version in sight.

TAKEAWAYS:

  • Lamar Smith apparently has decided to be the enemy of internet freedom and privacy in the House, so those of us working in IT who also like not being treated like criminals should keep an eye on him. Come to think of it when he leaves the House (I figure due to a scandal) we should ALSO keep an eye on him. Oh, and he’s a jerk.
  • Considering Smith introduced it, my guess is this bill could be a back-door to SOPA like shenanigans. If IPSs had to keep this information, it would be a lot easier to add SOPA-like abuses.
  • Technically a bill like this is a disaster as well, but note it’s not as much an “internet breaker” as SOPA. I’m suspecting this could be part of SOPA-returns-in-pieces.
  • The bill won’t come up until later this year, so it has a chance to die off – or be killed.
  • No, it’s apparent members of Congress don’t get the internet. *We* have to remind them.
  • I’m pretty sure Lamar Smith hates you.

– Steven Savage

A Look At Windows 8?

by

Engadget has it’s impressions of Windows 8 consumer. What I picked up:

  • The interface with XBox is limited, but pretty good. This makes the future of Windows/Microsoft pretty clear – full integration.
  • The System definitely shows it’s trying to have it all ways – it’s not a “complete re-invention” but, as Windows has so often been, a new system with a way of running old stuff.
  • Most of it sounds actually quite promising, except for some control foofaraw.

Microsoft is betting a lot on this because they need to move with the times and compete with a slicker, more tablet-oriented world that’s not as tolerant of idiosyncrasies of technology.

My Takeaways:

  • So, definitely imperfect, but also showing Microsoft put some thought into this (hell, in some cases too much thought), and is dedicated to moving this way in the future. Yes, that means you’ll probably have to put up with it.
  • Developers are going to need to keep on top of this of course, which roughly sums up as “Start Learning Metro.”
  • XBox developers also need to pay attention because the interface, which seems simple now, has a lot of promise. To whet your appetite, look at the Wii U controller. Now imagine a tablet connected to the Xbox . . .
  • For those of us working in IT, it’s another system to keep track of. Me, I’d like to see more on the security myself . . .
  • As this gets closer to market, watch to see what’s done with Apple and Android. Apple and the Android quarter know this is coming – we may have some surprises from their goody bag as it gets closer as a way to head off any Windows enthusiasm (which are words I so rarely put together anymore)

– Steven Savage