Steve’s Kill Your Cable Adventure #6: Not With A Bang, But With A Spare $90

So I got around to finally Killing My Cable.

We haven’t been using cable in my apartment for awhile anyway, as our regular readers know.  First, my roommate and I experimented in going without, but kept it around.  Then I cancelled TiVO, and I just didn’t get to canceling cable until recently because I kept forgetting to.

It was pretty simple – I called the company, cancelled, and took the card into the local office to turn in.  That was that.  No more cable.  A strange denouement to something I’ve been using for nearly 30 years.

Yet, an understandable end to something that just isn’t what it was three decades ago, or even a decade ago.

Walking into the local cable company office, the cable card in my pocket, it struck me how archaic it felt.  People with bulky cable boxes being returned or picked up, the line to talk to staff who clearly didn’t want to be there, the advertisements for services that no longer seemed new or fresh.  I could feel the age of the idea of cable itself weighing the place down.

Even the card I carried plugged into a bulky TiVO box.  This small device itself was a reminder of the odd negotiations of years past to get things to work together.  It was an artifact of old battles (as opposed to some of the new battles and continuing ones).

Cable feels aged, out-of-date, arthritic.

The office wasn’t a Genius Bar.  The technology seemed inappropriately large and ungainly.  The staff attitude wasn’t enthusiastic.  The service . . . well the service is something you can get anywhere, namely bland and uninterested.

At home I’ve got Netflix and Hulu on my Xbox or computer, with slick recommendations and all the programming I want.  I’ve got glittering, light, fast, friendly devices to deliver my content (among other things).  I can get what I want, when I want it, in many ways.

The age of content delivery is fast, slick, sexy, and smart – and with many options.

Cable still has the moribund feel of something that remembers being the only option.  It reminds me a bit of Microsoft back before Microsoft caught on and knocked everyone’s sox off with the XBox.  Perhaps that should offer cable companies hope – and something to think of.

I don’t miss cable.  I think, perhaps, I miss when cable was cool, when a new channel was amazing, when you could dig up neat treasures surfing around.  Those times are gone, and now the internet and Netflix and everything else offers a world of possibility – and focus.

I also wonder if Cable companies can truly move with the times.

I do believe it’s possible. A smart cable provider could become a kind of “ISP plus,” with all sorts of extra bundled services, premium content, and so forth.  It’d be a shift, indeed.  It’d be less profitable (if probably more stable) than they’re used to I’m quite sure.  It’d require effort, it would require change.

Sadly, I’m not seeing the kind of radical change that’s needed coming out of cable, though at some point the writing on the wall will be a bright neon glow that can’t be ignored.  By that time, it may be to late.

So now, I’m cable-free.

It should feel like something big or revolutionary.

Instead, by now, I just feel like my roommate and I are saving $90 a month between cable and TiVo.  I’m pretty attached to the money, but it’s still not the same.

Steven Savage

The Phenomena of “Wesley Crusher: Teenage F*** Machine”

It’s going to be difficult to do a straight-up analysis of this, but as I’m a bit contrarian, it’s not going to be that difficult.  Now, lest the title of the post make you think I’ve gone insane, let’s back up here.

Recently a Kindle book as been igniting the Amazon sales charts, likely due to its subject matter (Star Trek and sex), its title (“Wesley Crusher: Teenage F*** Machine,” only with less asterisks and more other letters), and the fact it’s free to users of Amazon Prime.  I’m not making this up, you can read the extremely NSFW recap here at io9.

(Again that is really NSFW.  You’ve been warned.)

If, of course you wish to read this, you can go here, download the book, and . . . well, hell if I know.  

Read more

3/9/2011: Gambling Isn’t The Solution

This is more Geekonomic and Economic than anything else, but Salon.com has a great look at why gambling isn’t the solution to economic problems.  There’s a lot to digest here, and some good comments.

If you consider it, gambling really does hollow out an economy.  It attracts money but does not generate wealth, innovation, goods, etc.  It also appears to force local economies into a kind of supportive overspecialization.  It’s not something, no matter your opinons on gambling, that’s a cure-all.

I bring this up because it applies to a number of issues:

  • Places trying to boost their economies with gambling may fail short term and long term – and fail spectacularly.  You may want to remember that if gambling is coming to your area.
  • If you’re relocating, you may want to scope out the gambling scene considering how popular it is – if your future town is looking for a quick fix, you may want to  look for a different future town.
  • This is an excellent, excellent reminder that there are businesses that create and generate and those that just take money in.

Steven Savage